RNA polymerases contain a conserved “secondary channel” in which proteins that regulate transcription can bind. In Escherichia coli bacteria, the secondary channel factors (SCFs) GreB and DksA both repress initiation of ribosomal RNA synthesis, but SCF loading and repression mechanisms are unclear. Sarah Stumper and her collaborators used fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence colocalization microscopy to show that the SCFs likely repress transcription through an interesting “delayed inhibition” mechanism in which the proteins arrive at DNA already complexed to RNA polymerase and block at a later stage of transcription initiation. The work explains factors that control the relative contributions of the two proteins to regulation and suggests a mechanism by which repression is restricted to ribosomal RNA and other promoters that form short-duration complexes with RNA polymerase.
Delayed inhibition mechanism for secondary channel factor regulation of ribosomal RNA transcription.
Stumper, S.K., Ravi, H., Friedman, L.J., Mooney, R.A., Corrêa, I.R., Gershenson, A., Landick, R., and Gelles, J.
eLife (2019) 8:e40576
Jeff Gelles’ and Douglas Theobald’s laboratories were just awarded a grant from NIGMS to develop new statistics-based methods for deducing the mechanisms of biochemical processes from single-molecule fluorescence data.
We have 1-2 postdoctoral positions on this project available for Ph.D. scientists with a strong computation background; for more information see the job announcement.
In human genes, protein-coding regions alternate with non-coding “introns” that must be snipped out of the RNA transcript before it is used to produce a protein. The snipping is done by the spliceosome, a complex molecular machine that must assemble anew on each intron it removes. The spliceosome must cut out exactly the segments of the messenger molecule that require removal, no more and no less, since inaccurate intron removal can produce a messenger molecule that is non-functional or that causes disease.
To help understand how multiple introns are quickly and accurately removed, postdoctoral fellow Joerg Braun developed a light microscopy method by which for the first time we can observe the coordinated processes by which human spliceosomes recognize and assemble around the segments of single messenger RNA molecules. As the eLife digest puts it: “The experiments show that spliceosomes working on different introns in the same pre-mRNA actually help each other out. As one assembles, this helps the spliceosome that processes the neighboring intron to get built. In particular, the U1snRNPs [a spliceosome sub-assembly] processing nearby introns collaborate to promote the assembly and activity of the spliceosomes. This teamwork is likely important to guarantee that multiple introns are cut out quickly and accurately.”
Synergistic assembly of human pre-spliceosomes across introns and exons.
Joerg E. Braun, Larry J. Friedman, Jeff Gelles, and Melissa J. Moore.
eLife (2018) 7:e37751.
New plasmids reported in this article can be obtained from Addgene.
Computer software used in this research can be obtained from GitHub.
In living cells, messenger RNAs are not manufactured by RNA polymerases (RNAPs) functioning alone. Instead, RNA synthesis is carried out collectively by RNAP together with accessory proteins that associate with the RNAP-containing transcription elongation complex and modulate its activity. In this paper, Larry Tetone, Larry Friedman, and Melissa Osborne, along with their collaborators from the Gelles and Landick labs, used multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence methods to for the first time directly observe the dynamic binding and dissociation of an accessory protein with an RNAP during active transcript elongation. The protein, GreB, is important for transcript proofreading in E. coli and other bacteria and is a functional analog of the TFIIS protein in eaukaryotes. “Unexpectedly,” the authors report, “GreB was not selectively recruited to RNAPs requiring its transcript proofreading function. Instead, GreB transiently bound to multiple types of complexes, eventually finding via random search RNAPs that require its activity. The observations suggest a paradigm by which a regulator can act while minimizing obstruction of a binding site that must be shared with other proteins.”
Dynamics of GreB-RNA polymerase interaction allow a proofreading accessory protein to patrol for transcription complexes needing rescue
Larry E. Tetone, Larry J. Friedman, Melisa L. Osborne, Harini Ravi, Scotty Kyzer, Sarah K. Stumper, Rachel A. Mooney, Robert Landick, and Jeff Gelles
PNAS (2017) 114:E1081-E1090.
New plasmids reported in this article can be obtained from Addgene
“The spliceosome is a complex molecular machine, composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) and accessory proteins, that excises introns from precursor messenger RNAs (pre-mRNAs). After assembly, the spliceosome is activated for catalysis by rearrangement of subunits to form an active site.” This study used multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence (“CoSMoS”) techniques to elucidate the mechanism of budding yeast spliceosome activation. Activation turns out to be unexpectedly dynamic and variable: some spliceosomes take multiple attempts to activate and the pathway contains both reversible and irreversible steps. Strikingly, ATP powers both steps that drive the process forward toward splicing and well as reverse steps that diassemble intermediates to allow subsequent re-attempts at activation. These findings give new insight into how the efficiency and fidelity of pre-mRNA splicing is maintained.
The scientific project in this paper was initiated by Aaron Hoskins during his postdoctoral work in Melissa Moore’s and Jeff Gelles’ labs, but it was brought to fruition by Aaron and Margaret Rodgers working in Aaron’s lab at Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.
Single molecule analysis reveals reversible and irreversible steps during spliceosome activation
Aaron A. Hoskins Margaret L. Rodgers , Larry J. Friedman , Jeff Gelles , Melissa J. Moore
eLife (2016) 5:e14166